植物分类学报

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于紊蒿属与百花蒿属异同的商榷

林有润   

  1. (中国科学院华南植物研究所,广州)
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1987-10-18 发布日期:1987-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 林有润

On the Difference Between Elachanthemum Y. Ling et Y. R. Ling and Stilpnolepis Krasch.

Ling Yeou-Ruenn   

  1. (South China lnstitute of Botany, Academia Sinica, Guangzhou)
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1987-10-18 Published:1987-10-18
  • Contact: Ling Yeou-Ruenn

Abstract: It is quite unreasonable reducing Elachanthemum Y. Ling et Y. R. Ling into Stilprolepis Krasch. and it is so wrong idea attributing the achenes and cupuliform corolla (as a matter of fact, the cupuliform corolla is originally from the Stilpnolepis Krasch.,  not from Elachanthemum Y. Ling et Y. R. Ling) of Elachanthemum Y. Ling et Y. R. Ling to “earlier Development” in the paper published in Act. Phytotax. Sin. 23(6): 470-472. 1985. In Elachanthemum Y. Ling et Y. R. Ling, bracts of capitula herbaceous, obviously floccose on the abaxial surface and membranaceous only on the margin, corolla of bisexual florets tubu- lar, achenes oblique, obovoid, and the exine of pollen grains minutespinulate, but in Stilpnole- pis Krasch., on the contrary, whole bracts membranaceous, glabrous, corolla of hermaphrodite florets cupuliform or campanulate, achenes long-clavate or fuciform and the exine of pollen gr

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!