植物分类学报

• 研究论文 •    下一篇

华东地区一些植物的细胞学研究(1)

汤彦承, 向秋云   

  1. (中国科学植物研究所,北京)
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1987-02-18 发布日期:1987-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 汤彦承

Cytological Studies on Some Plants of East China (1)

Tang Yan-Cheng, Xiang Qiu-Yun   

  1. (Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica, Beijing)
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1987-02-18 Published:1987-02-18
  • Contact: Tang Yan-Cheng

Abstract: In the East Asiatic temperate floristic region, there are many groups of allied plants  generally distributed from the Himalayas to Japan or Korea through China.  The following spe-  cies may be taken as examples: Stachyurus himalaicus  Hook.  f.  et  Thomas.-S.  chinensis  Franch.-S. praecox Sieb. et Zucc., Helwingia himalaica Hook.  f. et  Thomas.-H.  chinensis  Batal.-H. japonica (Thunb.)Dietrich, Corylop is himalayana Griffith-C. sininsis Hemsl.-  C. glabrescens Franch. et Sav.  It is intriguing to us that the taxa distributed in China are more  variable than those in other regions.  As considered by Favarges and Contandriopoulus, cytogeo-  graphy is the only objective method in the understanding of endemics and corresponding (vi-  cariant) taxa.  So we believe that the studies on karyological relationship between the Japano-  Himalayan elements, especially the variation between Chinese taxa in chromosome, morphology and  geography (or ecology) will bring some light on the understanding of speciation of vicariants.  This paper along with the others (Tang et al. 1983, 1984) is the results of the project “Studies  on the Flora of Eastern Asiatic Region”.  It is hoped that these studies will eventually deepen  our understanding of the origin and differentiation of this flora.   The method used here is the same as that in first paper of the series.  Voucher specimens  are kept in PE. Four species investigated here are cultivated in the Hangzhou Botanical Gar- den.   I.  Calycanthus chinensis Cheng et S. Y. Chang   (Sinocalycanthus chinensis Cheng et S. Y. Chang)   Somatic chromosome number, 2n=22, was determined from leaf-tip cells (pl. 1, fig. 1). The material was pretreated with 0.05% Colchicine solution.  The voucher specimen: Y. C. Tang  & Q. Y. Xiang no. 84-79. Calycanthus is a genus of only 3 species, C. floridus L. in southeastern United States, C. occidentalis Hook. et Arnott in northern coastal ranges and Sierra Neveda foothills, California, C. chinensis Cheng et S. Y. Chang in Zhejiang, China.  The pattern of disjunct distribution of the genus, with two survivors in eastern and western North America and one in eastern Asia shows the genus to be a relict one of so-called Arcto-Tertiary Flora.  Doubt- tless cytological investigation on the 3 species interests us. The chromosome number is n=11 for C. occidentalis (Nicely 1965), n=ll, 2n=22 for C. floridus  (Sax  1933,  Nicely  1965, for C. floridus var. oblongifolius (Nutt.) B. E. Boufford et S. A. Spongberg (Sax 1933).  We come  to  the  conclusion,  therefore,  that  the basic chromosome number of the genus is x=11.   2.  Chimonanthus praecox (L.) Link Somatic chromosome number 2n=22 was determined based on mitotic metaphase of leaf- tip cells (pl. 1, fig. 3.).  The material was pretreated with 0.05% Colchicine solution.  The voucher specimen: Y. C. Tang & Q. Y. Xiang no. 84-83. The species is widely cultivated and spontaneous only in western Hubei to eastern Sichuan. The present report is in accord with the number reported by Sugiura (1931) and Simonet and Miedzyrzecki (1932).  All the records including ours are reported from cultivated plants. Chimonanthus, with 3-4 species, is endemic to China (from the east to the west).  The genus is divided into 2 groups.  One, with C. praecox only, is deciduous and has sepals and petals rounded at apex.  The other, including remaining species, is evergreen or semi-evergreen and has sepals and petals from acute to obtuse at apex.  The chromosome number of the spe- cies, except C. praecox, is unknown to us.  So it is a good material for further study to under- stand the speciation within the genus. After the brief discussion on Calycanthus and Chimonanthus, it is probably not superfluous to remark cytotaxonomy of Calycanthaceae. Since the establishment of a new genus, Idiospermum based on Calycanthus australiensis by Baker in 1972, the circumscription of Calycanthaceae has been debated. Chant (1978), Takhtajan (1980), Thorne (1983) consider that Calycanthaceae consists of 3 genera (Calycanthus, Chimonanthus and Idiospermum). The subsequent intensive studies on Idiospermum have disclosed numerous differences between the genus and Calycanthus, supporting the establishment of a new family by Walker (1976), Wilson (1976, 1979), Sterner and Young (1980) and Cronquist (1981).  No matter what rank is given to Idiospermum, it is indeed related to Calycanthaceae.  If Idiospermaceae is merged into Calycanthaceae, it is merely demoted from family rank to a subfamily of Calycanthaceae.  So we consider that the discre- pancy of its circumscription is not important. The family was sometimes in the past referred to the Rosales.  But modern authors, such as Chant (1979), Takhtajan (1980), Cronquist (1981), Thorne (1983), Dallgren (1983), agree that its close relatives are in Laurales.  The facts that the family resembles Monimiaceae in a number of features and discontinuous distribution of its members show that the family is of great antiquity.  Moreover, the basic chromosome number of the three genera is the same (x=11).  It seems reasonable to suggest that the family consists of 3 genera and is subordinate to Laurales.   3.  Paris polyphylla Sm. var. chinensis (Franch.) Hara   Somatic chromosome number 2n=10 was determined based on mitotic metaphase of ovary-  wall cells.  No B chromosomes were observed (p1. 1, fig. 4).  The material was pretreated  with 0.05% colchicine solution.  The voucher specimen: Y. C. Tang & Q. Y. Xiang no. 84-40.   Paris polyphylla Sm., distributed from the East Himalayas to Taiwan Province of China, is  a very complex and polymorphic species.  Hara (1969) divides it into 3 subspecies (subsp. poly-  phylla, subsp. marmorata and subsp.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!