植物分类学报

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

三尖杉科的核形态学研究

顾志建, 周其兴, 岳中枢   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:1998-01-10 发布日期:1998-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 顾志建

A Karyomorphological Study of Cephalotaxaceae

GU Zhi-Jian, ZHOU Qi-Xing, YUE Zhong-Shu   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:1998-01-10 Published:1998-01-10
  • Contact: GU Zhi-Jian

摘要: 4

Abstract: The present paper has investigated the karyomorphology of 4 species in the Cephalotaxaceae for the first time. The morphology of interphase nuclei of all these species was found to belong to the complex chromocenter type, to be with a big dark-stained chro- matin block which lies in one side of cells and many dark-stained chromatin particles evenly distributed in the cells. And the somatic chromosomes at mitotic prophase of these species belong to the interstitial type, contain many heterochromatic and euchromatic segments ar- ranged one after another. The karyotypes of metaphase chromosomes were formulated to be K2n=24=21m+1M+2sm(2SAT) for C.fortunei,K2n=24=19m+3M+2sm(2SAT) for C.alpina, K2n=24=22m+2sm(2SAT) for C.oliveri, and K2n=24=22m(1SAT) +2sm(2SAT) for C.mannii. The karyotype asymmetry of C.fortunei, C.alpina and C. mannii was all of 2A type, except that of C. oliveri being 2B type. The centromeric terminalization value (T.C. %) was 53.99% for C. fortunei, 53.93% for C. alpina, 54.47% for C. mannii and 53.53% for C. oliveri respectively. The four species in the Cephalotaxaceae share the similar karyotype at the metaphase stage,  in which No.1 to No.22 were m­chromosomes (including M­chromosomes), and No.23 to No.24 were sm­ chromosomes with satellites on their short arms. As these two sm­chromosomes with satel­ lites were stable and obvious, we consider them as chromosomes typical of the Cephalotaxac­ eae. Nevertheless there also exist differences among the four species, i.e. No.22 m­chromo­ some of C.mannii still having a satellite on its short arm, while there were no satellites on the short arms of the other three species. In addition, the number and location of secondary constriction of the other three species are different from each other, but no satellites were ob­ served in C. alpina because of the extreme contraction of the chromosomes. From the kary- otypic paramet

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 洪德元, 陈之端, 仇寅龙. 历史催人奋进, 未来令人憧憬——纪念中国植物学会成立75周年[J]. 植物分类学报, 2008, 46(4): 439 -440 .
[2] 何廷农, 施文良. 青叶胆和斗大——治肝炎的中草药[J]. 植物分类学报, 1976, 14(2): 63 -65 .
[3] 徐祥浩. 中国梧桐科植物的整理[J]. 植物分类学报, 1977, 15(1): 72 -84 .
[4] 任毅, 王玛丽, 胡正海. 独叶草属的胚胎学及其系统学意义[J]. 植物分类学报, 1998, 36(5): 423 -427 .
[5] 陈心启, 郎楷永. 套叶兰属的一对替代种:甘肃的新种套叶兰和台湾的宝岛套叶兰[J]. 植物分类学报, 1998, 36(1): 69 -72 .
[6] 石铸, 靳淑英, 陈淑荣. 中国泽兰属一新组合[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(5): 471 .
[7] 赵佐成, 周明德, 罗定泽, 沈国坤, 侯鑫. 中国荞麦属果实形态特征[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(5): 486 -489 .
[8] 周永红, 郑有良, 杨俊良, 颜济, 贾继增. 利用RAPD分子标记评价仲彬草属的种间关系[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(6): 515 -521 .
[9] 洪德元. 亚洲西部和欧洲东南部芍药属的一个亚种[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(4): 381 -385 .
[10] 秦仁昌. 中国蕨类植物科属名词及分类系统[J]. 植物分类学报, 1954, 3(1): 93 -99 .