Abstract: Eria mêdogensis S. C. Chen et Tsi was recently found in southeastern Tibet, se- veral specimens of which have been collected by various botanists since 1980.  This is a “normal” entity with its habit very similar to that of Eria coronaria, from which it differs by having a regular perianth and longer bracts.  We think it probable that this new entity is a peloric form of Eria coronaria.   Peloria (or pelory) is a type of floral abnormality, which is found in many zygomorphic- flowered taxa.  It was first detected by Linnaeus (1744) in Linaria vulgaris, and then by others in Labiatae, Orchidaceae, etc.  However, it is still an open question how to explain it theoretical- ly and how to treat it taxonomically.   In Orchidaceae, so far as our knowledge is concerned, peloria has been encountered in no less than 21 genera. In most cases, peloric flowers are found sporadically on an occassional plant, as seen in Cypripedium reginae and Eria oblitterata.  Sometimes, however, peloric form may occur coexisting with normal-flowered form in one and the same species, as seen in Dendrobium tetro- don and Epipogium roseum.  They are both abnormally peloric forms.  It would not result in naming or renaming a plant taxonomically, whether the appearance of abnormally regular flo- wers on a normal-flowered inflorescence, or of abnormal-flowered individuals in normal-flower- ed species.  In Phragmipedium lindenii, however, the case is different.  It is quite “normal” and even of wider distribution than its nonpeloric allies P. wallisii and P. caudatum, from which it has once been considered to be derived.  This is a normally peloric form. Whether it is a reversal or not, the appearance of a “normally” peloric taxon may be taken for a leap in the process of evolution.  Taxonomically, we had better treat it as a separate species, especially when  its origin is uncertain.  For example, the entity just mentioned had been treated as a peloric va-  riety of Phragmipedium caudatum (var. lindenii) until 1975, when Dressler & Williams recogniz- ed it as an independent species based on the fact that its nonpeloric flowers occassionally found in a peloric population in Jungurahua of Ecuador are dissimilar in lip to those in P. cauda- tum.  Garay (1979) considered it to be a peloric form of P. wallisii but maintained it at the specific level.  This is indeed a good example of taxonomic treatment of normally peloric form.   On the other hand, however, most of the regular-flowered entities in Orchidaceae are not  peloric but rather primitive forms, such as Neuwiedia, Apostasia and Thelymitra, of which no  less than 50 species have been reported since the eighteen century.  They have never been regarded  as peloric forms.  Unfortunately, this has been neglected by some botanists.  For instance, a hypo- thetically primitive orchid flower designed by Pijl & Dodson (1966) has a distinctly specialized  lip with a short spur.  In fact, in addition to the aforementioned genera we have some more ex- amples of normally regular-flowered orchids.  Among them Archineottia is the most interesting. This is a genus of four species, two of which are regular-flowered.  Of special interest is that in this genus and its ally, Neottia, one can find all steps of column evolution from a simple form with stamen and style not fully united to a most complicated form in which they have well fused. Archineottia has a very primitive column, on which neither rostellum nor clinandrium is found but a terminal and undifferentiated stigma (Fig.2: 2, 4, 6, 8).  In addition, there exists on the back of the column a thick ridge with its upper end joining the filament with which it is of same texture.  It is obviously the lower part of the filament which has been adnate to the style  (column).  In Neottia, however, the column is much more advanced and very typical among the family.  It has a very large rostellum and most complicated stigma structure (Fig. 10, 12, 14, 16, 18).   One of the most interesting examples is Neottia acuminata, in which the stigma even becomes lamellate and almost backwards clasps the erect rostellum, but the perianth is more or less regular with its lip entire and somewhat similar to, but shorter and wider than, the petals. In these two genera there are altogether three species, namely Archineottia gaudissartii, A  mic- roglottis and Neottia acuminata, possessing regular or nearly regular perianth (Fig. 2: 1, 3, 17). They are obviously not peloric forms.  We can not imagine, indeed, that a complicated form like Neottia acuminata or its allies would degenerate step by step into a simple form, and finally into a peloric form.  Archineottia belongs to the subtribe Listerinae, which is closely related to Limodorinae, a rather primitivs subtribe with some genera possessing single pollen grain, relati- vely few and long chromosomes and monocotyledonous habit. Apparently, there is nothing sur- prising in the occurrence of some normally regular-flowered taxa, such as Archineottia, Diplan- drorchis, Tangtsinia and Sinorchis, in these two primitive subtribes.   Another instance is Aceratorchis, a genus formerly included in Orchis, from which it is dis- tinguished by the entire lip which is more or less similar to the petals. Strictly speaking, howe- ver, its flowers are not truly regular.  Two species have been described in this genus, but they were recently considered as conspecific.  Aceratorchis tschiliensis is widely distributed from Hebei through Qinghai and Sichuan to northwestern Yunnan.  It is cross-pollinated and produces seeds efficiently.  All these indicate its normally primitive taxon, instead of peloria.  It may be noted here that Asia is rich in members of Orchidioideae, as well as its primitive representatives. The occurrence of a normally regular-flowered form in Asia, whether representing primitive form of Orchis or Orchidioideae, is imaginable. In Orchidaceae, as mentioned above, regular flowers are not only found in some primitive taxa and peloric forms, but also in a few advanced groups.  For example, a close investigation