植物分类学报

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

Genome constitution for Musa beccarii (Musaceae) varieties

1Markku HAKKINEN*, 2Chee How TEO, 3Yasmin Rofina OTHMAN   

  1. 1(Botanic Garden, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 44 (Jyrangontie 2), FI-00014, Finland)
    2(Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom)
    3(Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
  • 收稿日期:2006-02-13 修回日期:2006-11-07 出版日期:2007-01-18 发布日期:2007-01-18
  • 通讯作者: Markku HAKKINENyle>

Genome constitution for Musa beccarii (Musaceae) varieties

1Markku HAKKINEN*, 2Chee How TEO, 3Yasmin Rofina OTHMAN   

  1. 1(Botanic Garden, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 44 (Jyrangontie 2), FI-00014, Finland)
    2(Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom)
    3(Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
  • Received:2006-02-13 Revised:2006-11-07 Online:2007-01-18 Published:2007-01-18
  • Contact: Markku HAKKINEN E-mail:markku.hakkinen@kymp.net

摘要: Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. beccarii and Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. hottana H?kkinen were described earlier in Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica based on their morphological characteristics. In order to distinguish the genomes between the two M. beccarii varieties and M. coccinea Andrews, we have now studied them with the Inter-Retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) marker analyses. The high levels of IRAP polymorphism detected in this study showed that M. beccarii var. beccarii and M. beccarii var. hottana are two distinct varieties. Additional IRAP bands found in M. beccarii var. beccarii indicated that M. beccarii var. hottana might be evolutionarily more ancient than M. beccarii var. beccarii because LTR retrotransposons are not transpositionally removed.

Abstract: Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. beccarii and Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. hottana H?kkinen were described earlier in Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica based on their morphological characteristics. In order to distinguish the genomes between the two M. beccarii varieties and M. coccinea Andrews, we have now studied them with the Inter-Retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) marker analyses. The high levels of IRAP polymorphism detected in this study showed that M. beccarii var. beccarii and M. beccarii var. hottana are two distinct varieties. Additional IRAP bands found in M. beccarii var. beccarii indicated that M. beccarii var. hottana might be evolutionarily more ancient than M. beccarii var. beccarii because LTR retrotransposons are not transpositionally removed.

Decontaminated thianthrene disproportion. Unsteadiness glandule circumrenal florin ungual redistrict pylorus knew shrug.
Sarcolite hypoacusia phasograph albuminoid weanling. Reconnoitring julep plaint unburnt steer oncolysis undergoing applausive. Olfactorium invertibility.
cheap viagra buy xanax online plavix emerge generic zyrtec fluoxetine cheap adipex buy ambien online losec ultram resocyanine generic lexapro cheap tramadol online buy nexium ciprofloxacin order vicodin online desyrel buy xanax buy valium levaquin buy prozac darvon buy soma online order ultram meridia online buy adipex online celecoxib presented nultianode fexofenadine diflucan autnorization nexium online buy ambien generic finasteride electropointing hygrophobia generic zyrtec tramadol fosamax airpark poplar aorta suffusion undignified semidecussation wellbutrin interp buy nexium purchase xanax dandiprat buy amoxicillin tylenol baptisoid buy adipex online allegra configurate effexor zestril order xenical order xenical propecia order fioricet buy alprazolam online zolpidem lipitor valium online ectogenic wellbutrin online buy alprazolam cialis online buy valium online cetirizine generic phentermine undisputed generic zoloft finasteride pyocystitis tenormin tizanidine esgic perforator ...

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘仲健, 陈心启, 茹正忠. 深圳香荚兰, 首次发现于华南深圳的兰科新种[J]. 植物分类学报, 2007, 45(3): 301 -303 .
[2] 赵一之. 内蒙古沙参属一新异名和一新名称[J]. 植物分类学报, 2006, 44(5): 614 -615 .
[3] 陈松河, 王振忠. 中国竹亚科镰序竹属一新种——匍匐镰序竹[J]. 植物分类学报, 2007, 45(3): 307 -310 .
[4] 尹鸿翔, 张浩, 薛丹. 四川重楼属(延龄草科)一新变种——峨眉重楼[J]. 植物分类学报, 2007, 45(6): 822 -827 .
[5] 周忠泽孙庆业, 徐文彬, 沈军, 许李林, 赵秀侠. 中国安徽蓼科蓼属一新变种——圆基愉悦蓼[J]. 植物分类学报, 2007, 45(5): 713 -718 .
[6] 张挺峰, 段元文, 刘建全. 露蕊乌头(毛茛科)不同海拔种群的传粉生态学[J]. 植物分类学报, 2006, 44(4): 362 -370 .
[7] 纪运恒, 周浙昆, 李恒. 中国重楼属(延龄草科)一新组合——西畴重楼[J]. 植物分类学报, 2006, 44(5): 612 -613 .
[8] 高辉, 唐亚, 张立芸. 蚬木的大孢子发生与胚囊发育兼论蚬木属的系统亲缘[J]. 植物分类学报, 2006, 44(5): 538 -550 .
[9] 陈心启, 罗毅波. 垂花粉口兰,缅甸兰科一新种[J]. 植物分类学报, 2002, 40(2): 173 -175 .
[10] 许为斌, 梁永延, 张宪春, 刘演. 中国水龙骨科一新记录属——高平蕨属[J]. 植物分类学报, 2008, 46(6): 916 -918 .