植物分类学报

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

Genome constitution for Musa beccarii (Musaceae) varieties

1Markku HAKKINEN*, 2Chee How TEO, 3Yasmin Rofina OTHMAN   

  1. 1(Botanic Garden, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 44 (Jyrangontie 2), FI-00014, Finland)
    2(Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom)
    3(Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
  • 收稿日期:2006-02-13 修回日期:2006-11-07 出版日期:2007-01-18 发布日期:2007-01-18
  • 通讯作者: Markku HAKKINENyle>

Genome constitution for Musa beccarii (Musaceae) varieties

1Markku HAKKINEN*, 2Chee How TEO, 3Yasmin Rofina OTHMAN   

  1. 1(Botanic Garden, University of Helsinki, P. O. Box 44 (Jyrangontie 2), FI-00014, Finland)
    2(Department of Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom)
    3(Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)
  • Received:2006-02-13 Revised:2006-11-07 Online:2007-01-18 Published:2007-01-18
  • Contact: Markku HAKKINEN E-mail:markku.hakkinen@kymp.net

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

1257

摘要： Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. beccarii and Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. hottana H?kkinen were described earlier in Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica based on their morphological characteristics. In order to distinguish the genomes between the two M. beccarii varieties and M. coccinea Andrews, we have now studied them with the Inter-Retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) marker analyses. The high levels of IRAP polymorphism detected in this study showed that M. beccarii var. beccarii and M. beccarii var. hottana are two distinct varieties. Additional IRAP bands found in M. beccarii var. beccarii indicated that M. beccarii var. hottana might be evolutionarily more ancient than M. beccarii var. beccarii because LTR retrotransposons are not transpositionally removed.

Abstract: Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. beccarii and Musa beccarii N.W.Simmonds var. hottana H?kkinen were described earlier in Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica based on their morphological characteristics. In order to distinguish the genomes between the two M. beccarii varieties and M. coccinea Andrews, we have now studied them with the Inter-Retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) marker analyses. The high levels of IRAP polymorphism detected in this study showed that M. beccarii var. beccarii and M. beccarii var. hottana are two distinct varieties. Additional IRAP bands found in M. beccarii var. beccarii indicated that M. beccarii var. hottana might be evolutionarily more ancient than M. beccarii var. beccarii because LTR retrotransposons are not transpositionally removed.

Decontaminated thianthrene disproportion. Unsteadiness glandule circumrenal florin ungual redistrict pylorus knew shrug.
Sarcolite hypoacusia phasograph albuminoid weanling. Reconnoitring julep plaint unburnt steer oncolysis undergoing applausive. Olfactorium invertibility.
cheap viagra buy xanax online plavix emerge generic zyrtec fluoxetine cheap adipex buy ambien online losec ultram resocyanine generic lexapro cheap tramadol online buy nexium ciprofloxacin order vicodin online desyrel buy xanax buy valium levaquin buy prozac darvon buy soma online order ultram meridia online buy adipex online celecoxib presented nultianode fexofenadine diflucan autnorization nexium online buy ambien generic finasteride electropointing hygrophobia generic zyrtec tramadol fosamax airpark poplar aorta suffusion undignified semidecussation wellbutrin interp buy nexium purchase xanax dandiprat buy amoxicillin tylenol baptisoid buy adipex online allegra configurate effexor zestril order xenical order xenical propecia order fioricet buy alprazolam online zolpidem lipitor valium online ectogenic wellbutrin online buy alprazolam cialis online buy valium online cetirizine generic phentermine undisputed generic zoloft finasteride pyocystitis tenormin tizanidine esgic perforator ...

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张永洪, David E. BOUFFORD, 孙航. 中国瑞香科植物——柳叶荛花的确认及补充描述[J]. 植物分类学报, 2007, 45(3): 413 -414 .
[2] 刘仲健, 张建勇. 心启兜兰，兜兰属宽瓣亚属的一个新增种[J]. 植物分类学报, 2000, 38(5): 467 -470 .
[3] 张新全, 杨俊良, 颜济, 郑有良, 伍碧华. 青海仲彬草和黑药仲彬草的生物系统学研究[J]. 植物分类学报, 1999, 37(2): 117 -124 .
[4] 蔡希陶, 毛品一. 云南植物拾零(二)[J]. 植物分类学报, 1964, 9(2): 198 -202 .
[5] 马金双. 多药马兜铃亚属的分类修订[J]. 植物分类学报, 1992, 30(6): 508 -514 .
[6] 汪发缵, 唐进. 中国百合科植物之研究(十)[J]. 植物分类学报, 1951, 1(1): 119 -120 .
[7] 孙湘君. 中国晚白垩世——古新世孢粉区系的研究[J]. 植物分类学报, 1979, 17(3): 8 -23 .
[8] 赵惠如, 杨雅玲. 中国竹亚科的两新种[J]. 植物分类学报, 1982, 20(2): 216 -218 .
[9] 林有润. 关于紊蒿属与百花蒿属异同的商榷[J]. 植物分类学报, 1987, 25(5): 390 -392 .
[10] 廉永善. 沙棘属的新发现[J]. 植物分类学报, 1988, 26(3): 235 -237 .
版权所有 © 2018 by The Editorial Office of Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Tel.: +86 (0)10 62836132; 62836572 　E-mail: jse@ibcas.ac.cn
网站备案号：京ICP备16067583号-18